Tuesday, June 5, 2018

A Proud Tradition

Commencement Address
To the Graduating Class of
Bard Early College Cleveland
June 5, 2018

By Charles S. Johnson

I want to extend my congratulations to the members of the class of 2018 for all of the hard work, dedication and sacrifice that brought you to this point, and to all of the institutional partners, the parents, family members, mentors and teachers who traveled with you along this journey.


Whether you know it or not, you carry on a proud tradition of extremely talented young people who stood out from their peers.


I have had the opportunity to know and work with some of your predecessors.


During the second World War, Morehouse College announced that it would accept any high school junior who could pass its entrance exam. As a young person I spent time working with an individual who rose to this challenge. After skipping the ninth and twelfth grades, this person graduated from high school, passed the entrance exam and entered Morehouse at the age of 15. This individual, Martin Luther King, Jr., went on to finish Morehouse, Crozier Seminary, Boston University, and played a major role in changing the society into which people of my generation were born.


As a young lawyer I spent time working with an individual who entered Dillard University at the age of 15 during the height of the Korean War, and he graduated from Howard University at the age of 19. This individual, Andrew Young, went on to become the first African American elected to Congress from the South since Reconstruction, to become the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, to become Mayor of Atlanta, and to play a key role in bringing the Centennial Olympic Games to Atlanta.


I worked with another individual who entered Morehouse College at the tail end of the Korean War and graduated from Morehouse at the age of 18. This individual, Maynard Jackson, not only went on to become Atlanta’s first African-American Mayor, but he fundamentally transformed the civic and economic life of the City.


We have come to expect great things from people like these who challenge themselves at an early age.


Let me tell you about the an experience that is very close to me.


My first home was on the campus of Fisk University. Two years after I was born, Fisk lost 100 of its students who were drafted to fight in the Korean War. Three years after I was born, Fisk lost another 240 students to this same Korean War-era draft. The wartime emergency resulted in an enrollment crisis for the university.


Some say it’s not a coincidence - perhaps it's a case of necessity being the mother of invention - but, with the generous support of the Ford Foundation, Fisk in 1950 initiated a basic college early entry program. The idea of the program was to seek out a few exceptional high school students at the junior and senior levels, take them out of unfriendly and unsupportive high schools, and allow them to proceed at an accelerated pace toward a bachelor’s or master’s degree on the Fisk campus.


The program was founded on the principle of individual ability and preparation - the notion that, when a number of alert and quick minds are brought together, the whole group can reach a higher level of interest and achievement. After the second or third year in the program these early entry students were integrated into the junior year of college.


Although on the same campus as the rest of the students, Fisk’s early entry students were set apart - living in separate residence halls, participating in extracurricular activities designed especially for them, taking separate courses. In some ways, it was a college within a college.


Even though these early entrants had one or two fewer years of formal schooling than the other people on campus, they scored better than the top regular-admission freshmen by a wide margin. These early entrants not only succeeded as undergraduates, but more than 91% earned at least one advanced degree – masters or above - and nearly 100% were involved in some kind of community service leadership after graduation.


The Fisk basic college early entrance program continued until 1956, when my grandfather, who had conceived of the basic college idea, and who had the relationship with the Ford Foundation, passed away.


In retrospect, there are those who have pointed out that, for all of its advantages, this program had some disadvantages as well. Chief among them was that, although the early entrants were academically advanced, not all of them were mature enough to cope with some of the aspects of college life, including the challenges of living in a social environment that was dominated by people who were a little more mature.


Nevertheless, we learned from experiments such as the ones at Morehouse, at Dillard, and at Fisk, that the early college idea - the idea of challenging young people when they are ready for the challenge - the idea that many of them are ready for the challenge much earlier than most people think - that this idea works, and it works very well.


But, in the wake of these mid-twentieth century early college experiments, we were left with an unresolved problem: How do you come up with a program for challenging precocious young people without placing them in an awkward social environment?


In the 1960s Betsy Hall came up with the idea of a stand-alone early college. This was the idea behind Simons Rock Early College. Simons Rock was not part of an existing college’s effort to combat a wartime decline in admissions. Instead, it was established for the sole and exclusive purpose of providing a challenge to the growing number of young people who were ready for college work at an early age, in an environment where they completed their high school requirements, as well as a challenging college curriculum, together (instead of being separated from their peers, instead of being sent off to a social environment that was not age appropriate).


This model of a self-contained early college soon caught the attention of Bard College, so much so that Bard not only brought the Simons Rock under its umbrella - Bard also became an evangelist for the early college gospel – the notion that 16 year olds are perfectly capable of doing university level work.


We made so much noise about this notion of the self-contained and highly challenging early college that the educational community began to call us out. The Chancellor of the New York Public Schools issued a challenge: If you’re so confident of your idea, why don’t you try it out in the setting of an urban public school, without cherry-picking those students who are the most well off and who have all the advantages?


Bard took the Chancellor up on his challenge. If we had failed, we would have folded after our first effort in New York. Instead, we now have a network that includes two tuition–free but highly challenging public high school early college campuses in the City of New York, one in Newark, New Jersey, one in Baltimore, Maryland, one soon to open in the Nation’s capital, and now, two in Cleveland.


But the number of campuses is not what's important: What's important is the results. We are frequently told that none of us wants to become a statistic. However, our record of performance includes statistics that we can all be proud of.


Whereas the average retention rate for 4 year colleges is 80%, And the average retention rate for 2 year colleges is 61%, Year 1 students at Bard Early Colleges are retained to year 2 at a rate of 98.6%.


82% of our students entering year 1 graduate with an AA degree.


A recent survey found that 85% of our high school graduates enroll in [a four-year] college within 18 months of completing high school. 96 % of our Manhattan and Queens alumni who enroll in college attain a bachelor’s degree within 6 years


So the record shows that this kind of partnership - between Bard, institutions such as the Cleveland public schools, the philanthropic community, our community partners, and our fabulous students - is a partnership that produces success.


That is why we have such great expectations of the class of 2018. We fully expect that the people in this room can and will change the world - in the manner of Martin Luther King, Andrew Young, or Maynard Jackson - or in your own special way in whatever field you choose.


We have these great expectations of you because you have already started along the same road that these giants have traveled. And as you have traveled along this road, you have met every challenge that we put in front of you.


And so I say to you, congratulations and best wishes for the continued success that we know lies ahead.

Friday, March 9, 2018

New Location Announced for Camp New Hope, Georgia's First Camp for Children Affected with Sickle Cell





By Jeanette Nu'Man
Coordinator, Camp New Hope
Operations Manager, Sickle Cell Foundation of Georgia
Remarks (Abridged) Given at Annual Sickle Cell Symposium
Morehouse School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia
March 3, 2018

Camp New Hope was founded by the Sickle Cell Foundation of Georgia ("SCFG") over 40 years ago for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease to provide them with opportunities to interact with children who share the same challenges and who understand those challenges. The camp has afforded them the experience to not be the only child with sickle cell disease in the class, school, neighborhood, family; to just be children and not “the kid with sickle cell.” SCFG provides services to the campers and their families 365 day a year, not just one week during the summer or just one point in time.

Standing before you are campers, former campers, and counselors. Kadeem served as a camp counselor and started volunteering with SCFG when he was 18. He is now a full time employee, camp coordinator and trained counselor educator. Tayo is a former counselor and now runs a family business. She is the lead counselor for females; works on the camp planning committee; and plans services and activities for youth. Blaze is a counselor and trained as a medical assistant. After completing his studies, he learned that he could not work in that position because it required standing for long periods of time and aspects of his disease make that impossible. He is currently the camp administrator/registrar and being trained as an administrative assistant. Kobi is a former camper and is in her second year of college. She used the SCFG's Community Health Worker ("CHW") program for support as she transitioned from pediatric to adult care. Kobi is a sickle cell disease advocate who tells her story and talks to legislators. She will return as a counselor.  Valerie is a former camper and still in high school. She gets support from our CHW, Natasha, as she prepares to leave pediatric care and enter the adult care system. Valerie is an active participant in youth activities sponsored by SCFG. Ms. Arlene and Ms. Coretta are counselors and work on the camp planning team. Ms. Paula is a former counselor. This is Camp New Hope, it’s more than one week in the summer.

Our camp has its detractors. There are those who tell us that we shouldn’t use counselors who are living with sickle cell, but we strongly disagree.


Camp New Hope was founded on the premise of having counselors living with sickle cell disease, not only do they live  what is experienced by the campers, their examples give the campers hope – something to look forward to. Sienna can see herself becoming a Kobi; Valerie can see herself becoming a Tayo; the young man running around this room can see himself becoming a Kadeem or a Blaze. We will use individuals with sickle cell disease as counselors – that is part of what Camp New Hope is about (the name of the camp was coined by a camper who indicated that the counselors with sickle cell disease gave him hope).

Our children need and deserve more than just a week in the summer. We encourage parents with children living to sickle cell to enroll their children in Camp New Hope, and we need everyone to help spread the word that the REAL Camp New Hope - the original (and still the only) camp run by people who have spent over forty years supporting families affected by this dreaded disease - will be at a new location this year. Our camp will continue so for the benefit of young people like Xavier, who reports that Camp New Hope was his only source of positive male role models when he was growing up. He wants to volunteer when he’s old enough so that he can reach back and help those behind him like he was helped. That’s Camp New Hope.

Thursday, February 1, 2018

An Encounter with Greatness




I was 18 years of age in the Summer of 1967 - the time that has come to be referred to as the "Long Hot Summer." 

There were 159 incidents of racial violence around the United States - sometimes referred to as riots, sometimes referred to as rebellions.

From July 12th to July 17th, violence broke out in the City of Newark. 26 people died, 727 people were injured, and 1,465 people were arrested. From July 23rd the July 28th violence broke out in the City of Detroit. It was a time when people began to question whether non-violence had run its course.

In response to all this violence, in the middle of the Detroit riot, President Lyndon Johnson on July 28, 1967 issued Executive Order 11365, establishing a commission to investigate the causes of these disturbances. The Commission was commonly referred to by the name of its chairman, former Illinois governor Otto Kerner.

One of the people I worked with in the summer of 1967 was John Lewis who, among other things, was on the board of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern Christian Leadership Conference. In August of 1967, John Lewis invited me to join him in Atlanta for the SCLC’s Annual Meeting. It was my first opportunity to spend any real time at Atlanta, other than to change planes. For an 18-year-old college student, this was pretty heady stuff - having the opportunity to spend time with people who had dedicated their lives to bringing about the kind of change which was so badly needed in this country, and particularly in the south - people like Reverend Al Sampson, Hosea Williams, Ralph Abernathy and, of course, Martin Luther King Jr.

The theme of this conference was “Where do We Go from Here?” and that was the theme that Dr. King took up in his Presidential Address. He stressed the fact that he thought non-violence was still a viable tool to bring about social change. He also stressed the importance of redirecting the Movement to focus on issues of economic justice and systemic change:

“When I say question the whole society, it means ultimately coming to see that the problem of racism, the problem of economic exploitation and the problem of war all tied together. These are the triple evils that are interrelated. . . . One day, we must come to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring."

In December of 1967, Dr. King unveiled the SCLC's plan to conduct a Poor People's Campaign that following year. The campaign would bring together poor people of all races and from across the country to a new March on Washington, to demand better jobs, better homes, better education, and better lives and the ones they were then living. In the early part of 1968, Rev. Sampson paid a visit to Bard College for the specific purpose of generating support for the Poor People's Campaign and, during that visit, he asked me to help organize support for the Campaign in the Mid-Hudson area, which I agreed to do.

On February 29 1968, after seven months of investigation, the Kerner Commission issued its Final Report. The report concluded that the insurrections of the previous summer were caused by black frustration at the lack of economic opportunity. In its most famous passage, the Report warned that our nation was rapidly approaching two societies - one black one white - separate and unequal. The Report called for the creation of jobs, an end to de facto segregation, the establishment of government programs that provided needed services, the hiring of more diverse and sensitive police forces, and the investment of billions of dollars in new safe sanitary and desegregated housing. Dr. King's response was to call on the nation to adopt the Commission’s recommendations.

In the Spring of 1968, there was an effort to organize a union among sanitation workers in the city of Memphis Tennessee. Dr. King aligned with a struggle of the poor and black sanitation workers in Memphis. He suggested that their struggle for dignity was a dramatization of the issues taken up by the Poor People's Campaign: a fight by capable hard workers against dehumanization, discrimination and poverty wages in the richest country in the world.

One day Rev. Sampson called me and told me that Dr. King was coming to do a tour of New Jersey. He asked me to come and help support that tour. That's how I came to spend the day doing advance work for Dr. King on March 27, 1968.

This tour was pretty heavily covered in press reports, so we have a pretty good record of what happened.

The first stop was Mt. Calvary Baptist Church, where Dr. King held a press conference and explained the purpose of the Poor People's Campaign.

The next stop was Queen of Angels, where Dr. King thanked Monsignor Thomas Carley for making space available for the SCLC staff.

Then the party proceeded downtown for a luncheon with representatives of the Greater Newark Chamber of Commerce.

After lunch, Dr. King paid a surprise visit to Spirit House. There Dr. King visited and paid respects to the playwright known as Leroy Jones, who later became known as Amiri Baraka. Despite their philosophical differences, they talked about the need for a united front.

The next stop was Southside High (now known as Shabazz), where Dr. King spoke for 20 minutes to a crowd of 1,200 students. With the recent civil disturbances in Newark fresh in everyone's minds, Dr. King urged the students to reject the popular mantra of “burn baby burn,” and instead embrace another mantra – “learn baby learn” – which would take them on a path toward “earn baby earn.”

At the Community Baptist Church in Paterson, a thousand people greeted Dr. King outside the sanctuary and another 500 people heard him inside.

At Metropolitan AME Zion Church in Jersey City, Dr. King spoke to a crowd estimated at 2,000.

Several hundred more people were on hand to cheer him at the next stop, Union Baptist Church in Orange.

He also visited Colonnade Apartments.

He concluded his tour at Abyssinian Baptist Church in Newark where, despite being two hours late, the motorcade was met by 1,500 people at the curb. He again urged the crowd to support the Poor People's Campaign.

At every stop, Dr. King received a warm reception. He promised that this would not be his last visit to New Jersey – that he would be back

Abyssinian was not the last stop on the schedule. At some point, everyone realized that this whole tour was running late. Dr. King’s speeches began to be prefaced with “I would rather be Martin Luther King Jr. late than the late Martin Luther King Jr.” People in the inner circle began to realize that we were would not be able to make all of the scheduled stops. 

Eventually, Rev. Sampson and I were asked to go ahead to some of the venues that Dr. King would not be able to reach. Our job was to explain the delay, extend everyone's apologies, and try to encourage folks to overlook their disappointment and nevertheless support the goals of the Poor People's Campaign.

We now know that, despite his promise to return to New Jersey for another visit, Dr. King never returned. He also never got a chance to lead a Second March on Washington.

The next day, March 28th, Dr. King and Dr. Abernathy flew to Memphis to take part in a march to support sanitation workers. This particular march got out of hand. There were reports of violence on the part of some of the participants.

All of a sudden, people began to raise new questions about the legitimacy and viability of non-violence, and about SCLC's ability to conduct a disciplined non-violent March. If people began to lose faith in SCLC's ability to lead a non-violent march, the future of the Poor People's Campaign would be in doubt. And so, so whatever plans Dr. King may have had to focus on the Poor People's Campaign and the New March on Washington, it became clear he would have to spend some more time in Memphis, showing that non-violence still worked, and that the March 28th incident was a fluke.

That's how it happened that Dr. King was in Memphis on April 4th 1968.

So when we gathered on the National Mall later that summer for the extended Second March on Washington, in the venue on the National Mall that became known as Resurrection, City, Dr. King was not with us.

But we carried on.

We carried on because we knew that that was what Dr. King would have wanted us to do.

Copyright © 2018 Charles S. Johnson. All rights reserved.